Whether physical
or mental pain always has a cause. Everything which happens is part of a
process. When we sit, pain may develop in the legs, back, shoulders and neck.
When it develops, we normally identify the pain with ourselves. Out of habit,
we start think ing or rather judging ourselves. We say "I am in
pain" rather than "there is pain". Because we have
been conditioned to react in this way, we consider this view perfectly normal
and justifiable. The first description "I am in pain" is
subjective and is an outcome of a defiled view. The second expression
"there is pain" reflects more objectivity. It is much more
accurate to say that "there is pain". There is no self, with
which to identify the pain. In saying "I am in pain, my ear is
painful, my shoulder is aching" we are already personalising the pain.
-Venerable Dhammasami
Mindful Equanimity
Buddhist quotes and links
Saturday, June 15, 2013
Sunday, May 12, 2013
Search->Possession->Loss
People are constantly trying to get beautiful things, animate or inanimate. If they do not get them, they go on searching for them until they succeed.
When they come to possess them, they to keep them and prevent them from being lost or destroyed. Thus, people are constantly striving, and constantly suffering. In the same way, they long to get other pleasant experiences, such as sweet sounds, delicious tastes, delightful touches, and they entertain fond hopes and thoughts. They strive to keep themselves healthy and long-lived so that they may enjoy these pleasures longer. In making these efforts, people have to feel anxious about themselves and others.
Though they try to obtain and maintain these pleasures, things do not happen as they wish. Pleasures go as quickly as they come. Decay soon sets in and destroys them. Then people suffer greatly, not only physically, but mentally too.
This affects not only human beings, but celestial beings too, who also try with similar purposes. Do not imagine that if one becomes a celestial being due to one’s good deeds that one gets to a place where every wish is fulfilled, and one becomes fully satisfied. No one is ever satisfied with what they have, and will always crave for more or better things.
To get more, further efforts must be made, and suffering will result from those efforts.
-Mahasi Sayadaw "A Discourse on the Hemavata Sutta"
When they come to possess them, they to keep them and prevent them from being lost or destroyed. Thus, people are constantly striving, and constantly suffering. In the same way, they long to get other pleasant experiences, such as sweet sounds, delicious tastes, delightful touches, and they entertain fond hopes and thoughts. They strive to keep themselves healthy and long-lived so that they may enjoy these pleasures longer. In making these efforts, people have to feel anxious about themselves and others.
Though they try to obtain and maintain these pleasures, things do not happen as they wish. Pleasures go as quickly as they come. Decay soon sets in and destroys them. Then people suffer greatly, not only physically, but mentally too.
This affects not only human beings, but celestial beings too, who also try with similar purposes. Do not imagine that if one becomes a celestial being due to one’s good deeds that one gets to a place where every wish is fulfilled, and one becomes fully satisfied. No one is ever satisfied with what they have, and will always crave for more or better things.
To get more, further efforts must be made, and suffering will result from those efforts.
-Mahasi Sayadaw "A Discourse on the Hemavata Sutta"
| Reactions: |
Friday, September 16, 2011
Udaya Sutta: Breaking the Cycle (SN 7.12)
Again and again, the seeds all get planted;
Again and again, the rain-god sprinkles rain.
Again and again, the farmer farms the field;
Again and again, the food grows in the realm.
Again and again, beggars do their begging;
Again and again, the givers give out gifts.
Again and again, the giver who has given;
Again and again, goes to a better place.
Again and again, he tires and he struggles;
Again and again, the fool goes to the womb.
Again and again, he's born and he dies;
Again and again, they bear him to his grave.
But one who's wisdom is wide as the earth
Is not born again and again,
For he's gained the path
Of not becoming again.
slightly modified from Andrew Olendski's translation
| Reactions: |
Sunday, June 5, 2011
Space
Our minds tend to get caught up with thoughts of attraction or aversion to objects, but the space around those thoughts is not attractive or repulsive. The space around an attractive thought and a repulsive thought is not different, is it?
Concentrating on the space between thoughts, we become less caught up in our preferences concerning the thoughts. So if you find that an obsessive thought of guilt, self-pity, or passion keeps coming up, then work with it in this way—deliberately think it, really bring it up as a conscious state, and notice the space around it.
Ajahn Sumedho
Concentrating on the space between thoughts, we become less caught up in our preferences concerning the thoughts. So if you find that an obsessive thought of guilt, self-pity, or passion keeps coming up, then work with it in this way—deliberately think it, really bring it up as a conscious state, and notice the space around it.
Ajahn Sumedho
| Reactions: |
Sunday, January 9, 2011
Infinite Regress
Two young boys were playing together. One asked the other, “We stand on the ground and the ground holds us up. What does the ground stand on?” “Oh, my father explained that to me,” the second boy said. “The ground is supported by four giant elephants.” “What do the elephants stand on, then?” “They stand on the shell of a huge turtle.” “What does the turtle stand on?” The second boy thought for a long time and then said, “I think it’s turtles all the way down.”
-Unknown
-Unknown
| Reactions: |
Saturday, October 2, 2010
Situated not in Space but in Time
It is in vain that we return to the places that once we loved. We shall never
see them again because they were situated not in Space but in Time, and
because the man who tries to rediscover them is no longer the child or the
youth who decked them with the fervour of his emotions.
The classic philosopher assumes that "our personality is built about a hard
and changeless core, is a sort of spiritual statue" which stands like a rock
against the assaults of the external world. Such is man as viewed by Plutarch,
by Moliere, and even by Balzac. But Proust shows us that the individual,
plunged in Time, disintegrates. The day comes when nothing at all remains of
the man who once loved, who once made a revolution. "My life, as I saw it, "
wrote Marcel Proust, "presented me with the spectacle of a succession of
periods so occurring that, but for a brief space of time, nothing of that
which had been one's sustaining force continued to exist at all in that which
followed it. I saw human life as a complex from which the support of an
individual, identical, and permanent 'self' was so conspicuously absent, was
something so useless for the future, so far extended into the past, that death
might just as well intervene at this point or that; because it could never
mark a conclusion that was other than arbitrary..."
The successive "selves" are so different from one another that each ought,
really, to have a different name.
The Quest For Proust
Andre Maurois, Ch. 6.
see them again because they were situated not in Space but in Time, and
because the man who tries to rediscover them is no longer the child or the
youth who decked them with the fervour of his emotions.
The classic philosopher assumes that "our personality is built about a hard
and changeless core, is a sort of spiritual statue" which stands like a rock
against the assaults of the external world. Such is man as viewed by Plutarch,
by Moliere, and even by Balzac. But Proust shows us that the individual,
plunged in Time, disintegrates. The day comes when nothing at all remains of
the man who once loved, who once made a revolution. "My life, as I saw it, "
wrote Marcel Proust, "presented me with the spectacle of a succession of
periods so occurring that, but for a brief space of time, nothing of that
which had been one's sustaining force continued to exist at all in that which
followed it. I saw human life as a complex from which the support of an
individual, identical, and permanent 'self' was so conspicuously absent, was
something so useless for the future, so far extended into the past, that death
might just as well intervene at this point or that; because it could never
mark a conclusion that was other than arbitrary..."
The successive "selves" are so different from one another that each ought,
really, to have a different name.
The Quest For Proust
Andre Maurois, Ch. 6.
| Reactions: |
Thursday, September 9, 2010
What's So Great About Now?
This article by Cynthia Thatcher is probably my favorite of all time:
tricycle.com
A few quotes:
"The more mindfulness we have, the less compelling sense-objects seem, until at last we lose all desire for them."
"Our entire lives are nothing but a chain of moments in which we perceive one sight, taste, smell, touch, sound, feeling, or thought after another. Outside of this process, nothing else happens."
"We think sense-impressions desirable only because we can't see beyond the conventions to their real characteristics."
"Note the difference between saying 'The present moment is wonderful' and 'It's wonderful to stay in the present.' This is more than a semantic quibble. The first statement implies that the bare sensory data occurring in the present are themselves little bits of divinity. The second allows that, by staying in the now, one can be free from the distress that comes from clinging to those sensations."
tricycle.com
A few quotes:
"The more mindfulness we have, the less compelling sense-objects seem, until at last we lose all desire for them."
"Our entire lives are nothing but a chain of moments in which we perceive one sight, taste, smell, touch, sound, feeling, or thought after another. Outside of this process, nothing else happens."
"We think sense-impressions desirable only because we can't see beyond the conventions to their real characteristics."
"Note the difference between saying 'The present moment is wonderful' and 'It's wonderful to stay in the present.' This is more than a semantic quibble. The first statement implies that the bare sensory data occurring in the present are themselves little bits of divinity. The second allows that, by staying in the now, one can be free from the distress that comes from clinging to those sensations."
| Reactions: |
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)